According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be
able to pass a zero
optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
case SO_BINDTODEVICE:
{
char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
/* Sorry... */
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:45:14 -0700
> According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be
> able to pass a zero
> optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
...
>
> However, earlier in that method it returns -EINVAL if o
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:45:14 -0700
> According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be
> able to pass a zero
> optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
...
> However, earlier in that method it returns -EINVAL if optl
David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:45:14 -0700
According to the comment in the net/core/sock.c code (in 2.6.20), I should be
able to pass a zero
optlen to the setsockopt method for SO_BINDTODEVICE:
...
However, earlier in that method it return
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:11:39 -0700
> From user-space, does this imply that the 'empty string' we use to
> unbind must be at least 4 bytes long, but with the first byte /0?
>
> If so, I think it might be confusing for the comments to say use ""
> to unbind,
David Miller wrote:
Instead of nit-picking, can you instead try the patch and let me
know if it makes things work for you?
I don't mean to complain, just trying to make sure that you
had thought about the length and were happy with how it works
before I try to get the man page changed.
I will
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:37:45 -0700
> I will try the patch, but it will probably not be until Monday.
> The existing code actually can be made to work by passing in
> a 4+ byte string and setting the first byte to zero, and as
> far as I can see, that remains
David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:37:45 -0700
I will try the patch, but it will probably not be until Monday.
The existing code actually can be made to work by passing in
a 4+ byte string and setting the first byte to zero, and as
far as I can se
