On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:45:36PM +, Ben Greear wrote:
>
> May 31 08:07:00 xeon-dt kernel: irqbalance: page allocation failure. order:1,
> mode:0x20
> May 31 08:07:00 xeon-dt kernel: [<78147393>] __alloc_pages+0x1d8/0x2b8
> May 31 08:07:00 xeon-dt kernel: [<7815c525>] kmem_getpages+0x2f/0x8
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:45:13 -0700
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, I think I found the problem. It appears to be at least partially
self-inflicted. I was modifying the kernel buffer settings via /proc/*
to improve performance. I noticed that when I used ke
On Wed, 31 May 2006 14:45:13 -0700
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I think I found the problem. It appears to be at least partially
> self-inflicted. I was modifying the kernel buffer settings via /proc/*
> to improve performance. I noticed that when I used kernel-defaults,
> the TC
Ok, I think I found the problem. It appears to be at least partially
self-inflicted. I was modifying the kernel buffer settings via /proc/*
to improve performance. I noticed that when I used kernel-defaults,
the TCP connection hangs stopped (and ran ~20% slower). My personal opinion
is that th
Ben Greear wrote:
I haven't seen this problem on 2.6.13, so I'm now starting a manual bisect
to see if I can narrow down where the problem appeared.
Turns out, I can reproduce it in 2.6.13, and 2.6.9. I haven't tried anything
older.
I also tried to reproduce it using a simpler traffic genera
Auke Kok wrote:
Ben Greear wrote:
Kernel is 2.6.16.16 with my patches, including a patch to the
e1000.
what patch? I don't see it anywhere.
Well, it's reproducible with only the send-to-self patch, so I figured it
wouldn't
help to show the e1000 patches. Also, it is reproducible on tg3,
Ben Greear wrote:
Kernel is 2.6.16.16 with my patches, including a patch to the
e1000.
what patch? I don't see it anywhere.
Cheers,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kerne
Ben Greear wrote:
Kernel is 2.6.16.16 with my patches, including a patch to the
e1000. I also rebuilt a fresh kernel with only the attached
send-to-self patch. I see the hang, but there was no OOM messages,
probably because the machine was freshly rebooted and had plenty
of buffers available.
