Mellanox ConnectX3 Pro and kernel 4.4 low throughput bug

2016-02-09 Thread John
I'm running into a bug with kernel 4.4.0 where a VM-VM test between two different baremetal hosts (HP Proliant dl360gen9s) has receive-side throughput that's about 25% lower than expected with a Mellanox ConnectX3-pro NIC. The VMs are connected over a VXLAN tunnel that I used OpenvSwitch

Re: Throughput Bug?

2007-10-19 Thread Rick Jones
Matthew Faulkner wrote: I removed the socket sizes in an attempt to reproduce your results Rick and i managed to do so, but only when i launch netperf by typing in the follow cmd in to the bash shell. /home/cheka/netperf-2.4.4/src/netperf -T 0,0 -l 10 -t TCP_STREAM -c 100 -C 100 -f M -P 0 -- -m

Re: Throughput Bug?

2007-10-19 Thread Matthew Faulkner
I removed the socket sizes in an attempt to reproduce your results Rick and i managed to do so, but only when i launch netperf by typing in the follow cmd in to the bash shell. /home/cheka/netperf-2.4.4/src/netperf -T 0,0 -l 10 -t TCP_STREAM -c 100 -C 100 -f M -P 0 -- -m 523 As soon as i try to

Re: Throughput Bug?

2007-10-18 Thread Rick Jones
Matthew Faulkner wrote: Hey all I'm using netperf to perform TCP throughput tests via the localhost interface. This is being done on a SMP machine. I'm forcing the netperf server and client to run on the same core. However, for any packet sizes below 523 the throughput is much lower compared to

Re: Throughput Bug?

2007-10-18 Thread Bill Fink
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Matthew Faulkner wrote: Hey all I'm using netperf to perform TCP throughput tests via the localhost interface. This is being done on a SMP machine. I'm forcing the netperf server and client to run on the same core. However, for any packet sizes below 523 the throughput