From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:45:53 +0300 (EEST)
> I found out this shows up when 900fd17dd01d2c99dfd1ec0b53a860894a2673ee is
> included, kernels before that seem to work fine. The problem description
> is in this same thread. I'm not going to repeat it here
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Try a different network adapter.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I thought I had already done this but I just noticed that it is so
> > > that the adapter was s
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> > > Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > > ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward
> > > > and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> > Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward
> > > and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule out more possibilities...
> > > Or is there some kno
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward
> > and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule out more possibilities...
> > Or is there some knob which I don't know of that should be toggled or
> >
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Rick Jones wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > Some time ago I noticed that with 2.6.18 I occassionally get latency
> > spikes as long as 100-200ms in the TCP transfers between components
> > (I describe later how TCP was tuned during these tests to avoid
> > proble
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Hi,
...
Some time ago I noticed that with 2.6.18 I occassionally get latency
spikes as long as 100-200ms in the TCP transfers between components
(I describe later how TCP was tuned during these tests to avoid
problems that occur with small segments). I started to investigate
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward
> and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule out more possibilities...
> Or is there some knob which I don't know of that should be toggled or
> something, is 2.6 network stack expected to behave t
Hi,
I've been trying to figure out unexcepted delay spikes that seem to occur
for TCP flows with 2.6 (tested 2.6.18.8 + a punch of own modifications and
also with 2.6.20.7 with a single additional changeset only that enables me
to TCP's control initial window at will). I'll first describe the
