On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
>
>> > May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
>> > the patch was tested successfully.
>> >
>> Hi Julian
>>
>> I've had this patch being tested
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Hi Cong
>
> I believe your patch makes a lot of sense, please submit it formally ?
>
I have been waiting for Subash's testing, since I myself never even run it.
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> > May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
> > the patch was tested successfully.
> >
> Hi Julian
>
> I've had this patch being tested for the last 3-4 days in our regression rack
> and I haven't seen the
May be I'm missing some posting but I don't see if
the patch was tested successfully.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov
Hi Julian
I've had this patch being tested for the last 3-4 days in our regression
rack
and I haven't seen the same issue being reproduced or even a related
crash
or l
Hello,
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> > wrote:
> > > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> > >
> > > It appears as if memory of th
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> wrote:
> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >
> > It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> > and allocated
> > t
On 2017-09-08 10:10, Cong Wang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
wrote:
We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in
some path
and allocated
to ion driver. ion driver has als
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 10:19 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:16:53 -0700
>
> > On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> >> wrote:
> >> > We are seeing a possible use after
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:16:53 -0700
> On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
>> wrote:
>> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>> >
>> > It appears as if memory of the __D
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 09:10 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> wrote:
> > We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >
> > It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> > and allocated
> > t
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:12:09 -0700
Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> > Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> >
> >> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
> >>
> >> It appears as if memory of
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
>
>> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>>
>> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some
>> path and allocated
>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
wrote:
> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>
> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some path
> and allocated
> to ion driver. ion driver has also freed it. Finally the memory is
[ 3489.194392] __ion_alloc+0x180/0x988
I do not see the __ion_alloc function in my tree.
Hi David
This function seems to be defined in an Android specific change.
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/20a5411d0115b16826f3d327b6abb0192c8a2001
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The
From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
> [ 3489.194392] __ion_alloc+0x180/0x988
I do not see the __ion_alloc function in my tree.
Should be fixed by:
commit ad65a2f05695aced349e308193c6e2a6b1d87112
Author: Wei Wang
Date: Sat Jun 17 10:42:35 2017 -0700
ipv6: call dst_hold_safe() properly
Thanks for the info Stefano.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Auror
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 18:52:02 -0600
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
> We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
>
> It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some
> path and allocated
> to ion driver. ion driver has also freed it. Finally the memo
We are seeing a possible use after free in ip6_dst_destroy.
It appears as if memory of the __DST_METRICS_PTR(old) was freed in some
path and allocated
to ion driver. ion driver has also freed it. Finally the memory is freed
by the
fib gc and crashes since it is already deallocated.
Target is
18 matches
Mail list logo
