Re: another networking lockdep trace.

2006-08-09 Thread David Miller
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:52:23 +1000 > Nice. This is a bug introduced less than 2 weeks ago. We're finally > getting some dividends from the lock validator :) Thanks guys! Horray! :-) > [IPV6]: The ifa lock is a BH lock > > The ifa lock is expected to be

Re: another networking lockdep trace.

2006-08-09 Thread Herbert Xu
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Aug 7 06:47:44 localhost kernel: inconsistent {in-softirq-W} -> > {softirq-on-W} > usage. > Aug 7 06:47:44 localhost kernel: ip/2617 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: > Aug 7 06:47:44 localhost kernel: (&ifa->lock){-+..}, at: [] > inet6_addr_add+0xf8/0x13

another networking lockdep trace.

2006-08-08 Thread Dave Jones
>From a recent rc3-git kernel. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk --- Begin Message --- Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201560