On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:11:28 +0100, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But: This shows us that the struct ieee80211_txb is useless
> and should be eliminated. Look at how d80211 handles fragments.
> It sends every single fragment in an skb to the driver. I think
> this is _much_ more painl
On Monday 06 March 2006 00:43, you wrote:
> > + txb->fragments[i] = NULL; /* Take skb from ieee80211_txb_free */
> > + dma_tx_fragment(ring, skb, i);
> > //TODO: handle failure of dma_tx_fragment
> > }
> >
> > + ieee80211_txb_free(txb);
>
> This seems even m
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:43:24 +0100, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but I think the fix is to save the txb when transmitting
> the last fragment rather than the first.
This was my idea at first, too.
> > + txb->fragments[i] = NULL; /* Take skb from ieee80211_txb_free */
On Monday 06 March 2006 00:09, you wrote:
> Hi, Michael:
>
> It seems to me that the today's wireless-2.6 git contains bcm43xx which
> does not free txb's correctly, if I understand it right.
>
> Consider a situation where a txb with two skb's is sent down.
> The dma_tx_fragment will save the poi
