On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:23:07 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
Both cases are highly unlikely for the above macros, but please keep in
mind that some aspiring programmers view the kernel as an example of
good programming style.
This wasn't meant to be included in the kernel (that would be indeed
bad,
This patch should be enough to allow creation of standalone d80211 tarball
(i.e. version of d80211 that could be compiled without patching the vanilla
kernel) after invisible master interface patches.
It is completely untested.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi,
This patch should be enough to allow creation of standalone d80211 tarball
(i.e. version of d80211 that could be compiled without patching the vanilla
kernel) after invisible master interface patches.
That looks very nice indeed, that saves me quite a big patch
I usually apply to the
Hi, Jiri!
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 18:48 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
+#define register_invisible_netdevice register_netdevice
+#define unregister_invisible_netdevice unregister_netdevice
Please use macros with arguments whenever possible. This way, incorrect
macro invocations would be
