Shaw Vrana wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I have a question about the use of the tx_ring->next_to_use variable in
the e1000. Specifically, I'm wondering about a race between the use of
next_to_use in e1000_xmit_frame and the clearing of next
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I have a question about the use of the tx_ring->next_to_use variable in
>> the e1000. Specifically, I'm wondering about a race between the use of
>> next_to_use in e1000_xmit_frame and the clearing of next_t
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a question about the use of the tx_ring->next_to_use variable in
> the e1000. Specifically, I'm wondering about a race between the use of
> next_to_use in e1000_xmit_frame and the clearing of next_to_use in
Hello All,
I have a question about the use of the tx_ring->next_to_use variable in
the e1000. Specifically, I'm wondering about a race between the use of
next_to_use in e1000_xmit_frame and the clearing of next_to_use in
e1000_down via e1000_clean_tx_ring.
Thread 1 (_xmit) -> first = adapter->t
