On Sun, 2007-16-12 at 15:43 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Jamal's going to hate me but setkey(8) already uses this so we're
> stuck with it anyway.
>
> The test is
>
> up->index % 8 >= 3
>
> This is true iff it's a socket policy.
I would have loved it if user space had a say ;->
In the cas
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:21:18AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> I can see where to filter these, but I am ignorant of how to
> identify the socket policies. Are they just marked as sub-policies?
Jamal's going to hate me but setkey(8) already uses this so we're
stuck with it anyway.
The tes
