On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 06:02 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:26 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:24 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > > Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
> > > "udp: refactor memory accounting" se
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 10:26 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:24 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
> > "udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
>
> My fault: I missed udplite in my tests.
>
> Thank you f
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:24 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
> "udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
My fault: I missed udplite in my tests.
Thank you for reporting.
I'm fine with Eric's patch, setting both .memory_allocate
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 16:31 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:58 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, you are right. It works if we set .memory_allocated and .sysctl_mem.
>
> Now the question would be :
>
> Are we okay if UDP and UDPlite share the same limits ?
>
> I w
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:58 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>
> Yes, you are right. It works if we set .memory_allocated and .sysctl_mem.
Now the question would be :
Are we okay if UDP and UDPlite share the same limits ?
I would vote for yes, because these default limits are huge anyway
(The 50% re
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
> "udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
>
> # good: [f970bd9e3a06f06df8d8ecf1f8ad2c8615cc17eb] udp: implement
> memory accounting helpers
> git bisect good f
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:24 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
>> "udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
>>
>> # good: [f970bd9e3a06f06df8d8ecf1f8ad2c8615cc17eb]
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:35 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> I guess following patch would be needed ?
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udplite.c b/net/ipv4/udplite.c
> index
> af817158d830c0da080935ba29e012dffbb89112..12604c0371c451efcc9aad278bb86be9ac4bb813
> 100644
> ---
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 15:24 -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
> "udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
>
> # good: [f970bd9e3a06f06df8d8ecf1f8ad2c8615cc17eb] udp: implement
> memory accounting helpers
> git bisect goo
Hi Paolo,
Our test system detected a kernel oops. Looks like a problem in the
"udp: refactor memory accounting" series.
# good: [f970bd9e3a06f06df8d8ecf1f8ad2c8615cc17eb] udp: implement
memory accounting helpers
git bisect good f970bd9e3a06f06df8d8ecf1f8ad2c8615cc17eb
# bad: [2d0e30c30f84d08dc16f
10 matches
Mail list logo
