Hi all,
After merging the all the trees, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/vhost/scsi.c: In function 'vhost_scsi_open':
drivers/vhost/scsi.c:1422:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
vs = vzalloc(s
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 22:06 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the all the trees, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/vhost/scsi.c: In function 'vhost_scsi_open':
> drivers/vhost/scsi.c:1422:3: error: implicit declaration of func
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:06:07 +1000
> Ouch :-(
The only thing I will say on this matter is that the _only_ way this
problem will go away is if someone does the work necessary to get rid
of that implicit vmalloc.h include that happens on all x86 platform
builds.
So if yo
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> I've applied the following to net-next, thanks for your report.
>
>
> [PATCH] treewide: Add missing vmalloc.h inclusion.
>
> All of these files were only building on non-x86 because of
> the indirect of inclusion of vma
From: Joe Perches
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:51:15 -0700
> On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:42 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> I've applied the following to net-next, thanks for your report.
>>
>>
>> [PATCH] treewide: Add missing vmalloc.h inclusion.
>>
>> All of these files were only
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 14:35 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Bogus chunk in my local tree, didn't make it into the final commit I
> pushed out.
Thanks for taking care of this before me !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 08:26:51 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> We were alerted of this problem thanks to kbuild test robot.
>
> This fix is not a definitive one I hope.
No, just something to allow me to get my tree to build so I could go to
bed :-)
> Golden rule is that vmalloc() users mu
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 28 May 2015 11:42:03 -0700 (PDT) David Miller
wrote:
>
> The only thing I will say on this matter is that the _only_ way this
> problem will go away is if someone does the work necessary to get rid
> of that implicit vmalloc.h include that happens on all x86 platform
> builds.
>
