net-2.6.24 plans

2007-10-03 Thread David Miller
I'm a bit behind after investigating the TCP performance issues that turned out to be HW specific problems. It's a bit of a dissapointment, I thought maybe there was a cool bug to fix in TCP :-) Anyways, that means there are patches backlogged in my inbox and it is also about time to do the

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-20 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 10:17 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: 2) ATMEL USB driver These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25. Also, atmel isn't even ported to mac80211 yet, is it? 3) NL80211 I need to

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-20 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:19:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote: So it looks like what's left is: 1) ATH5K driver 2) ATMEL USB driver These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25. 3) NL80211 I need to check w/

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-20 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:50:52PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 10:17 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: 2) ATMEL USB driver These are both really new. I think I'll transfer them to my wireless-2.6 tree, but still hold them back at least until 2.6.25. Also, atmel

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-20 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:07:00PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-19 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400 John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S.

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-19 Thread David Miller
From: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:07:00 -0400 And the latest incarnation: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/git-wireless-2007-09-19-16-57-43-0500.patch And is even smaller...down an additional 30%, or almost 1/6th of the

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-18 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:51:57PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700 The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree. Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the napi_struct

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-18 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400 John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch -- I'm sure you don't want a complicated git invocation... Until then, I don't think

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-18 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:23:28PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:49:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400 John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch -- I'm sure you

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:10:40 -0400 David Miller wrote: We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI driver

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between linux-2.6/net-2.6 and net-2.6.24, but I'll likely defer that until the net-2.6 fixes I

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700 These two: git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch plus boatloads of stuff in wireless. Andrew, can you send these two to me under seperate cover? I'll

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread John W. Linville
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess a lot of this could be avoided if I simply merge in whatever external stuff you're sucking in. plus boatloads of stuff in wireless. I

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400 I just (minutes ago) finished the mop-up of the patch mess which had accumulated on me during my KS-related travel and the subsequent period of catching-up. (I'm sure I still missed something or botched

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400 John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch -- I'm sure you don't want a complicated git invocation... Until then, I don't think you should try pulling wireless-dev... OK, thanks. The stuff I

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT) David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700 These two: git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch plus boatloads of

RE: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Nelson, Shannon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:18 PM To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans [...] Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
] Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans [...] Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only conflicts and fixes you should need at this point are: [...] Which IOAT patch are you referring to? The 'uninitialized variable' one, you should have a copy. If not, Andrew definitely does

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Andrew Morton
: Re: net-2.6.24 plans [...] Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only conflicts and fixes you should need at this point are: [...] Which IOAT patch are you referring to? A dopey one-liner which removes unused variable `u16 chanctrl'. It caused rather a mess due to all

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700 The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree. Andy sent me a fix-it-for-net-2.6.24 patch which I'll send. It applies on top of the git tree. ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch got

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread David Miller
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700 The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree. Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the napi_struct conversion was good too. That only leaves the wireless bits :-) - To

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-17 Thread Andy Gospodarek
On 9/17/07, David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700 The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree. Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the napi_struct conversion was good

net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-16 Thread David Miller
Most if not all of my 2 week backlog of patches is in the net-2.6.24 and net-2.6 tree now. And any relevant -stable fixes will be submitted in the next day or two. Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between

Re: net-2.6.24 plans

2007-09-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI driver and audit it in the net-2.6.24 tree. You could try that weird post patches on