net merged into net-next

2018-12-20 Thread David Miller
There were a bunch of conflicts, but the issue seemed to be more about quantity than difficulty in resolution. Saeed, thanks for the conflict resolution guidance it helped a lot. I always like to do the resolutions by hand so I can double check things, rather than pull a resolution from a GIT t

[GIT] net merged into net-next

2018-09-04 Thread David Miller
Just FYI...

net merged into net-next

2018-05-21 Thread David Miller
Please double check my work, although the conflict resolutions were relatively trivial this time. Especially interested for some of us is that now both networking tree have the fixes to objtool for gcc-8 which was causing tons of bogus warnings to be emitted. Recent upgrades to Fedora 28 would h

Re: [GIT] 'net' merged into 'net-next'

2018-03-23 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 13:36 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe > Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:26:22 -0600 > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:40:59AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > > > > > This merge was a little bit more hectic than usual. > > > > > > But thankfully, I had some sampl

Re: [GIT] 'net' merged into 'net-next'

2018-03-23 Thread Ido Schimmel
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:40:59AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > This merge was a little bit more hectic than usual. > > But thankfully, I had some sample conflict resolutions to work > with, in particular for the mlx5 infiniband changes which were > the most difficult to resolve. > > Please do

Re: [GIT] 'net' merged into 'net-next'

2018-03-23 Thread David Miller
From: Jason Gunthorpe Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:26:22 -0600 > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:40:59AM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> >> This merge was a little bit more hectic than usual. >> >> But thankfully, I had some sample conflict resolutions to work >> with, in particular for the mlx5 infiniba

Re: [GIT] 'net' merged into 'net-next'

2018-03-23 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:40:59AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > > This merge was a little bit more hectic than usual. > > But thankfully, I had some sample conflict resolutions to work > with, in particular for the mlx5 infiniband changes which were > the most difficult to resolve. > > Please do

[GIT] 'net' merged into 'net-next'

2018-03-23 Thread David Miller
This merge was a little bit more hectic than usual. But thankfully, I had some sample conflict resolutions to work with, in particular for the mlx5 infiniband changes which were the most difficult to resolve. Please double check my work and provide any fixup patches if necessary. Thank you.

[GIT] net merged into net-next

2018-03-05 Thread David Miller
If I botched up any part of the merge, please send me fix up patches. Thank you.

Re: net merged into net-next

2018-01-21 Thread Jason Wang
On 2018年01月21日 04:17, Cong Wang wrote: On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:02 PM, David Miller wrote: Cong, please check my conflict resolution of drivers/net/tun.c, thank you. It looks good to me except I am not sure about the xdp_rxq_info_unreg() inside tun_cleanup_tx_ring(). Looks correct to me.

Re: net merged into net-next

2018-01-20 Thread Cong Wang
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:02 PM, David Miller wrote: > > Cong, please check my conflict resolution of drivers/net/tun.c, thank > you. It looks good to me except I am not sure about the xdp_rxq_info_unreg() inside tun_cleanup_tx_ring().

net merged into net-next

2018-01-19 Thread David Miller
Cong, please check my conflict resolution of drivers/net/tun.c, thank you.

Re: net merged into net-next

2018-01-17 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 01/17/2018 06:19 AM, David Miller wrote: > > Daniel, please double check my merge work especially wrt. your > packet scheduler fix. The merge resolution for the qdisc bits looks good to me, thanks!

Re: net merged into net-next

2018-01-16 Thread Saeed Mahameed
Dave, The resolution of the mlx5_ifc conflict was wrong and it causes a build break in mlx5, oops :(. I hope my resolution instructions in my pull request didn't mislead you. I will post a patch. -Saeed.

net merged into net-next

2018-01-16 Thread David Miller
Daniel, please double check my merge work especially wrt. your packet scheduler fix. Thanks!

Re: net merged into net-next

2016-04-25 Thread Craig Gallek
Thanks David, There was one other change that conflicts (functionally) with this merge as well: 3b24d854cb35 ("tcp/dccp: do not touch listener sk_refcnt under synflood") It did a similar hlist_nulls -> hlist transform for the TCP stack. I'll send a formal patch to address this as well. Craig On S

Re: net merged into net-next

2016-04-23 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 20:12 -0400, David Miller wrote: > Eric, please double check my merge work for net/ipv4/udp.c > > In net we fixed a soreuseport bug that added a hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu() > call to net/ipv4/udp.c > > And in net-next you converted UDP sockets away from nulls lists. > > Ther

net merged into net-next

2016-04-23 Thread David Miller
Eric, please double check my merge work for net/ipv4/udp.c In net we fixed a soreuseport bug that added a hlist_nulls_add_tail_rcu() call to net/ipv4/udp.c And in net-next you converted UDP sockets away from nulls lists. Therefore I had to add a hlist_add_tail_rcu() implementation to linux/rcul