Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-08 Thread David Miller
From: Kyeong Yoo Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:07:57 +1300 > This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 > ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") > and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. > > First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which wil

[PATCH net-next v3] net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-06 Thread Kyeong Yoo
This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will then peek into sfq. sfq dequeues an skb and it's stored in sch->g

Re: [net-next PATCH v2] net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-06 Thread Kyeong Yoo
I will upload new patch soon. Kyeong On Sun, 2016-03-06 at 22:49 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Kyeong Yoo > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:25:19 + ... > Your patch is corrupted by your email client, it has MS-DOS style > newlines, etc.

Re: [net-next PATCH v2] net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-06 Thread David Miller
From: Kyeong Yoo Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:25:19 + > This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 > ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") > and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. > > First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will

[net-next PATCH v2] net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-03 Thread Kyeong Yoo
This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will then peek into sfq. sfq dequeues an skb and it's stored in sch->g

Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-02 Thread David Miller
From: Kyeong Yoo Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:19:51 + > Author: Kyeong Yoo > > net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked() ... > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 10:26 -0800, Cong Wang wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kyeong Yoo >> wrote: Please do not

Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-02 Thread Cong Wang
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kyeong Yoo wrote: > Author: Kyeong Yoo > > net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked() > > This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 > ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") > and makes use of

Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-02 Thread Kyeong Yoo
Author: Kyeong Yoo net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked() This fix is for dsmark similar to commit 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e249 ("net_sched: prio: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked") and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. First time, wrr peeks dsm

Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-02 Thread Cong Wang
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Kyeong Yoo wrote: > This fix is for dsmark similar to 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e24958ab1884e0, > and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. > > First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will then peek into sfq. > sfq dequeues an skb and it'

Re: net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-02 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 3/2/2016 7:10 AM, Kyeong Yoo wrote: This fix is for dsmark similar to 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e24958ab1884e0, scripts/checkpatch.pl now enforces certain commit citing format, yours doesn't match it. and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call.

net_sched: dsmark: use qdisc_dequeue_peeked()

2016-03-01 Thread Kyeong Yoo
This fix is for dsmark similar to 3557619f0f6f7496ed453d4825e24958ab1884e0, and makes use of qdisc_dequeue_peeked() instead of direct dequeue() call. First time, wrr peeks dsmark, which will then peek into sfq. sfq dequeues an skb and it's stored in sch->gso_skb. Next time, wrr tries to dequeue fr