Re: please revert. Was: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova

2017-05-26 Thread David Miller
From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 21:40:59 -0700 > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:13:27AM -0400, David Miller wrote: >> From: Alexei Starovoitov >> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:58:32 -0700 >> >> > Dave, please revert this Innova fpga stuff. >> > I think you pushed it by accident, since i

Re: please revert. Was: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova

2017-05-25 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:13:27AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexei Starovoitov > Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:58:32 -0700 > > > Dave, please revert this Innova fpga stuff. > > I think you pushed it by accident, since it was mixed with > > other valid changes. > > The discussion didn't conc

Re: please revert. Was: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova

2017-05-25 Thread David Miller
From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:58:32 -0700 > Dave, please revert this Innova fpga stuff. > I think you pushed it by accident, since it was mixed with > other valid changes. > The discussion didn't conclude. > Myself and Jes are clearly against such changes. > It definitely nee

please revert. Was: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova

2017-05-25 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 02:44:02PM +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Ilan Tayari > > Mellanox Innova is a NIC with ConnectX and an FPGA on the same > board. The FPGA is a bump-on-the-wire and thus affects operation of > the mlx5_core driver on the ConnectX ASIC. > > Add basic support for Inno