From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: 09 May 2017 06:50
> On Mon, 8 May 2017 19:42:46 +0200
> SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > > Which issue do you mean? I dont see any issue you fix here.
> >
> > Are the run time characteristics a bit nicer for the function seq_putc
> > in comparison to the function seq
On Mon, 8 May 2017 19:42:46 +0200
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Which issue do you mean? I dont see any issue you fix here.
>
> Are the run time characteristics a bit nicer for the function “seq_putc”
> in comparison to the function “seq_puts” for printing a single line break
> here?
>
> Rega
> Which issue do you mean? I dont see any issue you fix here.
Are the run time characteristics a bit nicer for the function “seq_putc”
in comparison to the function “seq_puts” for printing a single line break here?
Regards,
Markus
Hi,
On 08.05.2017 18:42, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 18:38:17 +0200
>
> A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
Why?
> Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle softwar
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 18:38:17 +0200
A single character (line break) should be put into a sequence.
Thus use the corresponding function "seq_putc".
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/sky