1186035057.207629127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP 5 > smtp [SYN]
Seq=0 Len=0
1186035057.207632127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP smtp > 5 [SYN, ACK]
Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=32792 Len=0 MSS=16396
1186035057.207666127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP 5 > smtp [ACK]
Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=1500 Len=0
1186035
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:19:06AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 1186035057.207629127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP 5 > smtp [SYN]
> Seq=0 Len=0
> 1186035057.207632127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP smtp > 5 [SYN, ACK]
> Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=32792 Len=0 MSS=16396
> 118603
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:19:06AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 1186035057.207629127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP 5 > smtp [SYN]
> > Seq=0 Len=0
> > 1186035057.207632127.0
On Thu, August 2, 2007 11:16, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:19:06AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > 1186035057.207629127.0.0.1 -> 127.0.0.1TCP 500
(Don't remove CC:s, don't top post)
>> On Thu, August 2, 2007 11:16, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov
>>> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:19:06AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 11860350
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I just got multiple RSTs instead of a connection too. The second RST looks
> like it's from another connection - and a RST for a RST is wrong...
You should use iptables rule to block non-raw access:
iptables -I IN
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 04:04:53PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:38:59PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > I just got multiple RSTs instead of a connection too. The second RST looks
> > like it's from another connection - and a
On 02/08/07 13:15, Simon Arlott wrote:
> (Don't remove CC:s, don't top post)
>>> On Thu, August 2, 2007 11:16, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:19:06AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:15:52PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 17:33:45.351273 IP 192.168.7.4.5 > 192.168.7.8.2500: R
> 1385353596:1385353596(0) win 1500
> 17:33:45.360878 IP 192.168.7.8.48186 > 192.168.7.4.5: R
> 1388203103:1388203103(0) ack 1385353596 win 14360
>
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:08:42PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> So, following patch fixes problem for me.
Or this one. Essentially the same though.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/af_inet.c b/net/ipv4/af_inet.c
index 06c08e5..7c4
On 02/08/07 19:08, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:15:52PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> 17:33:45.351273 IP 192.168.7.4.5 > 192.168.7.8.2500: R
>> 1385353596:1385353596(0) win 1500
>> 17:33:45.360878 IP 192.168.7.8.48186 > 192.168.7.4.5: R
>> 13
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:48:42 +0400
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:08:42PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > So, following patch fixes problem for me.
>
> Or this one. Essentially the same though.
Thanks a lot for figuring out thi
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:48:42 +0400
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:08:42PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > So, following patch fixes problem for me.
>
> Or this one. Essentially the same though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyak
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:21:34PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:08:42PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > So, following patch fixes problem for me.
> >
> > Or this one. Essentially the same though.
> >
> > Signed-off-by
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:58:03PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 19:24:32.897071 IP 192.168.7.4.5 > 192.168.7.8.2500: S
> 705362199:705362199(0) win 1500
> 19:24:32.897211 IP 192.168.7.8.2500 > 192.168.7.4.5: S
> 4159455228:4159455228(0) ack 705362200 win 14360
> 19:2
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Since the connection is considered closed, couldn't another socket re-use it?
>
> Socket A: Recv data (unread)
> Socket A: Recv RST
> Socket B: Reuses connection (same IPs/ports)
> Socket A: Close
>
> Wouldn't th
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:03:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, August 3, 2007 12:56, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> >> Since the connection is considered closed, couldn't another sock
On 03/08/07 13:09, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:03:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> On Fri, August 3, 2007 12:56, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> > wrote:
>> >> Since the con
On Fri, August 3, 2007 09:25, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:58:03PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> 19:24:32.897071 IP 192.168.7.4.5 > 192.168.7.8.2500: S
>> 705362199:705362199(0) win 1500
>> 19:24:32.897211 IP 192.168.7.8.2500 > 192.168.7.4.5:
On Fri, August 3, 2007 12:56, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:21:46PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> Since the connection is considered closed, couldn't another socket re-use it?
>>
>> Socket A: Recv data (unread)
>> Socket A: Recv RST
>> Socket B: Reuses
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 17:38:03.533589 IP 192.168.7.4.50550 > 192.168.7.8.2500: R
> 82517592:82517592(0) win 1500 (raw)
> vs
> 17:37:38.383085 IP 192.168.7.8.2500 > 192.168.7.4.50550: R
> 4259643274:4259643274(0) ack 1171836829 win 14
On 03/08/07 18:39, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
>> 17:38:03.533589 IP 192.168.7.4.50550 > 192.168.7.8.2500: R
>> 82517592:82517592(0) win 1500 (raw)
>> vs
>> 17:37:38.383085 IP 192.168.7.8.2500 > 192.168.7.4.50550
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:22:42 +0400
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:21:34PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > What in the world are we doing allowing stream sockets to autobind?
> > That is totally bogus. Even if we autobind, that won't
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:22:42 +0400
> Maybe recvmsg should be changed too for symmetry?
I took a look at this, and it's not %100 trivial.
Let's do this later, and only sendmsg for now in order to
fix the bug in the stable branches.
-
To unsubscribe fro
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 07:29:58PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On 03/08/07 18:39, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:51:42PM +0100, Simon Arlott ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 17:38:03.533589 IP 192.168.7.4.50550 > 192.168.7.8.2500: R
> >> 82517
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:04:51PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:22:42 +0400
>
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:21:34PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > What in the world are we doing a
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:17:17PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:22:42 +0400
>
> > Maybe recvmsg should be changed too for symmetry?
>
> I took a look at this, and it's not %100 trivial.
>
> Let's do this l
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 20:51:51 +0400
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:17:17PM -0700, David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:22:42 +0400
> >
> > > Maybe recvmsg should be changed
28 matches
Mail list logo