On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:29:56PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> And what's more the original code there modifying packets_out
> looks wrong.
Hmm I was actually careful in making sure the rewritten expression
did the same thing to packets_out so I hope that's not the case :)
I just had anoth
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:55:36 +1000
> Here is a patch that adjusts fackets_out accordingly.
And what's more the original code there modifying packets_out
looks wrong.
I think I'm going to push this in for 2.6.13.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:19:11PM +1000, herbert wrote:
>
> So cnt is equal to fackets_out - reordering. Normally
> fackets_out is less than packets_out. The only reason
> I've found that might cause fackets_out to exceed packets_out
> is if tcp_fragment is called from tcp_retransmit_skb with a
