From: Noriaki TAKAMIYA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:37:49 +0900 (JST)
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst
was NULL.
Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst
was NULL.
Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be possible at this point this
patch removes the NULL check.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
eeb6009cf3ef5f6993ced359330d877680617a70
diff --git
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst
was NULL.
Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be possible at this point this
patch removes the NULL check.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL
Hi,
Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:45:10 +0900
[Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use]
Masahide NAKAMURA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote...
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed