Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-15 Thread David Miller
From: Noriaki TAKAMIYA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:37:49 +0900 (JST) On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst was NULL. Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be

[2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-14 Thread Adrian Bunk
The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst was NULL. Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be possible at this point this patch removes the NULL check. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- eeb6009cf3ef5f6993ced359330d877680617a70 diff --git

Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-14 Thread Masahide NAKAMURA
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed if dst was NULL. Since dst being NULL doesn't seem to be possible at this point this patch removes the NULL check. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL

Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use

2007-10-14 Thread Noriaki TAKAMIYA
Hi, Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:45:10 +0900 [Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] __inet6_csk_dst_store(): fix check-after-use] Masahide NAKAMURA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:52:12 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Coverity checker spotted that we have already oops'ed