On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Remove the definition of IP_CT_NEW_REPLY from the kernel as it does
> not make sense. This allows the definition of IP_CT_NUMBER to be
> simplified as well.
I just realized that after V7 you stopped sending cover letter (patch 0/N)
with th
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:27:14PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Substitute calls to action insert function with calls to action insert
>> unique function that warns if insertion overwrites index in idr.
>
> I know this patch may be
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:13:06AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:27:14PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:58 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:13:57PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 02:03:42 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following patchset adds a new field to the tunnel metadata template
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 12:24 PM Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 09:42:42AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:58 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso
> > wrote:
> [...]
> > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 12:13:57PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:19 PM Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> The patch [1] is ready too. David may decide which one will be applied
> firstly. and other is rebased ?.
Your patch is for net, net-next is rebased over net
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1032952/
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:19 PM Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> The patch [1] is ready too. David may decide which one will be applied
> firstly. and other is rebased ?.
Your patch is for net, net-next is rebased over net
> [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1032952/
