On 14 April 2016 at 12:24, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>
> Thanks for coming up with this Arturo.
>
> I have a better way to fix this by not adding/removing the objects to
> the lists.
>
> Ping me back if I don't come up with the fix anytime soon.
ping :-)
--
Arturo Borrero
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:56:10PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Before this patch, chain deletetion abort path re-add chains in reverse
> order of what was originally in the ruleset.
> Invert the order, so the ruleset is exactly the same after abort.
>
> Example, using 2 config files:
Before this patch, chain deletetion abort path re-add chains in reverse
order of what was originally in the ruleset.
Invert the order, so the ruleset is exactly the same after abort.
Example, using 2 config files:
ruleset_good.nft:
8<
flush ruleset
table ip t {
chain c1 {