Re: [netmod] Dual mode validators needed

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 04:56:48PM +0200, Balazs Lengyel wrote: >Hello, >It must be possible to chose for validator tools whether I want to >validate according to Y1.0 or Y1.1. Why? A data model that says version 1.1 should be validated according to YANG 1.1 rules and a data model that

[netmod] Dual mode validators needed

Hello, It must be possible to chose for validator tools whether I want to validate according to Y1.0 or Y1.1. regards Balazs -- Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. Senior Specialist ECN: 831 7320 Mobile: +36-70-330-79

Re: [netmod] Agenda posted for IETF 93 meeting

All, the agenda for today's meeting has been updated. The update is as follows: * 10 min: draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply-00 (Juergen Schoenwaelder) Thanks, Kent From: Kent Watsen mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>> Date: Friday, July 17, 2015 at 10:47 AM To: "netmod@ietf.org

Re: [netmod] Y34

> On 21 Jul 2015, at 09:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:16:46AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> wrote: >>> >>> Lada, >>> >>> Y34 is closed and I have not seen any new argument here that indicates >>>

Re: [netmod] Y34

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:16:46AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > Lada, > > > > Y34 is closed and I have not seen any new argument here that indicates > > we made a major mistake with the resolution of Y34. As such, Y34 >

Re: [netmod] Y34

> On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > Lada, > > Y34 is closed and I have not seen any new argument here that indicates > we made a major mistake with the resolution of Y34. As such, Y34 > remains closed. Of course, I was expecting this reaction. I think I did present