[netmod] rib-data-model and routing-cfg

Hi, I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management data in a router. I can see three possible scenarios: 1. The i2rs-rib module will

[netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call. I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting more than one revision can cause problems, but I expect that it will happen in practice. I know it happens

Re: [netmod] [i2rs] rib-data-model and routing-cfg

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> On 09 Oct 2015, at 15:00, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> >> Hi Lada, >> I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing >> models that reference routing-cfg and even in-progress

[netmod] 6020bis extensions

section 6.3.1 states: If a YANG compiler does not support a particular extension, which appears in a YANG module as an unknown-statement (see Section 14), the entire unknown-statement MAY be ignored by the compiler. If a YANG parser does not support a particular extension, which

Re: [netmod] rib-data-model and routing-cfg

Hi Lada, I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing models that reference routing-cfg and even in-progress implementations. On 10/9/15, 4:13 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka" wrote: >Hi, > >I am sorry for

Re: [netmod] rib-data-model and routing-cfg

> On 09 Oct 2015, at 15:00, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > > Hi Lada, > I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing > models that reference routing-cfg and even in-progress implementations. Of course, I am aware of them. However, assuming that changes