Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from running a short consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones?
Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nadeau > Thomas > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:27 PM > To: William Lupton > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG > module > > > Dependance on 1.1 should not be an issue as that is almost ready to > be approved. You should be building your model to comply with the 1.1 rules. > > —Tom > > > > On Dec 11, 2015:8:00 AM, at 8:00 AM, William Lupton > <wlup...@broadband-forum.org> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > The Broadband Forum would like to use the ietf-entity YANG module > (currently draft-entitydt-netmod-entity) for equipment management but we > are a bit concerned about its draft status and its dependence on YANG 1.1. > Any advice or reassurance? > > > > Thanks, > > William _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
