[netmod] YANG Push (PubSub): draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push-01 new revision

An updated draft for YANG subscriptions was posted in NETCONF WG earlier in the week at draft-ietf-netconf-yang-push. Enhancements include: * Refined RPC & Notification definitions * Multiple targeted YANG subtrees within a single subscription     - includes custom filters for each target *

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06

I¹m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft too. On 2/26/16, 11:16 AM, "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" wrote: >No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft > > > > > >On 2/22/16, 5:22 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: > >>Authors, Contributors, WG, >>

Re: [netmod] explicit mount

Rob, I think chris spoke to this (indirectly) in an earlier mail -- that the current approach of not specifying is most flexible from a future proof stand point, i.e., we really don't want to specify based on what exists in today's rapidly moving environment. We have also discussed the

Re: [netmod] proposed change to ietf-routing

> On 26 Feb 2016, at 15:33, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > Hi Acee and Lada, > > Have a question: the schema hierarchy will be different after the changes. > Is the following expected? We will have ro branch and rw branch split in the > middle of the tree after mounting?

Re: [netmod] operational state: next step

WG, An update on this topic is overdue (my fault). A large part of the delay has been figuring out how to proceed with the conclusions from the analysis. Basically the/my conclusion is that none of the solution fulfills all requirements/considerations and that having a discussion centered

Re: [netmod] explicit mount

Lou, Martin, Is the network-instance schema-mount (from draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model) an example of where it would be useful to indicate which modules would be expected to be mounted at that point? Certainly it would seem that there are particular modules that you would expect to be

[netmod] proposed change to ietf-routing

Hi, as a part of synchronization of the routing data models that are being developed by the NETMOD and RTG working groups, the authors of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg propose to remove the routing-instance level in the data hierarchy, and leave it to structural-mount/YSDL to provide a top

[netmod] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02.txt

Hi, I have posted a new version of the structural mount draft, based on feedback from the interim. This version adds an option to require mounting of ietf-yang-library. I also discuss two alternative solutions in an appendix. /martin --- Begin Message --- A new version of I-D,

Re: [netmod] Consistency in YANG for Router IDs [Was: WG Chair comments on draft-raza-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang-02]

Hi Lada, Hi Benoit, this was discussed a while ago in this thread: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TehrMAboX-cMmmX537rs81DNl3I tl;dr: The WG decision then was to introduce a new type in ietf-inet-types, namely "dotted-quad", that explicitly does NOT have the semantics of an