Who is 'we'?
/js
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:45:42PM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Lada, NETMOD WG members,
>
> There are actually a number of changes that we would like to
> see in the ietf-routing model:
>
> - Remove routing-instances since ietf-routing since it will be
> “mounted” a
Hi All,
It¹s that time again.
Please reply to this email (with the information below) to request a
presentation slot in the NETMOD WG meetings at IETF 95 Buenos Aires.
Topic:
Draft:
Duration:
Presenter:
Thanks!
Ashesh
___
netmod mailing list
ne
Hi,
IMO the YANG 1.1 draft should use a github issue tracker so
I don't have to send typo stuff to the list.
The example on pg 48 has a wrong end tag
10
Andy
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/
Patrick,
Thanks for your review.
Regarding the severity leaf: multiple severities are already covered when
severity is specified because the default severity comparison is all messages
of the specified severity and greater. You can use of the optional
pattern-match string to select a message w
Hi Lada, NETMOD WG members,
There are actually a number of changes that we would like to
see in the ietf-routing model:
- Remove routing-instances since ietf-routing since it will be
“mounted” at different points in the device hierarchy dependent
on the device requirements.
- Collapse it int
Hi Kent,
Re-reading Juergen's email, I think that his main concern was whether
there would be sufficient reviewers of this draft. It is slightly
tricky because this draft is covering configuration that I believe many
network device vendors require and support to make their devices
function i
On 3/2/16, 4:45 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote:
>On 2/26/2016 1:13 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>> Hi Benoit, Lada,
>>
>> On 2/26/16, 3:32 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lada,
>>>
Hi Benoit,
this was discussed a while ago in this thre
> On 01 Mar 2016, at 00:07, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>
> The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never
> closed properly.
>
> Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never
> addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concern
dotted-quad is very much suitable to represent the router ID for various
protocols including LDP. This maintains the backward compatibility and is of
uint32 type.
Cheers,
Rajiv
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Benoit Claise (bclaise) wrote:
>
>> On 2/26/2016 1:13 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote
On 2/26/2016 1:13 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Benoit, Lada,
On 2/26/16, 3:32 AM, "netmod on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)"
wrote:
Hi Lada,
Hi Benoit,
this was discussed a while ago in this thread:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/TehrMAboX-cMmmX537rs81DNl3I
tl;dr: Th
10 matches
Mail list logo
