Re: [netmod] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

2016-05-25 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:43:09PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > > > - Abstract > > > > This Abstract does not list what the document does. E.g., define Yang > > 1.1. Also might help to mention upward-incompatibility. Basically, > > go through

Re: [netmod] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

2016-05-25 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:43:09PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > > > > > - Abstract > > > > > > This Abstract does not list what the document does. E.g., define Yang > > > 1.1. Also might help to mention upwa

Re: [netmod] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

2016-05-25 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:12:11PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:43:09PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > > > > > > > > - Abstract > > > > > > > > This Abstract does not list what

Re: [netmod] identical RIB augmentations in OSPF and ISIS YANG models

2016-05-25 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
"Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen" writes: > Hello, > > I notice that the OSPF and ISIS YANG models > ( and > ) each > defines its own augmentation to > /rt:routing-state/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:rout

Re: [netmod] identical RIB augmentations in OSPF and ISIS YANG models

2016-05-25 Thread Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen
Hi Lada, "metric" in this case is the operational state metric (or cost) of a route, and has identical definitions in in all three drafts (OSPF, ISIS, and RIB extension). (They're all defined to be type uint32, with no range or default value.) I understand that each protocol might define and con

Re: [netmod] identical RIB augmentations in OSPF and ISIS YANG models

2016-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Lada, Helen, On 5/25/16, 9:58 AM, "Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen" wrote: >Hi Lada, > >"metric" in this case is the operational state metric (or cost) of a >route, and >has identical definitions in in all three drafts (OSPF, ISIS, and RIB >extension). >(They're all defined to be type uint32, with no

Re: [netmod] identical RIB augmentations in OSPF and ISIS YANG models

2016-05-25 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Sigh… On 5/25/16, 10:09 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: >Hi Lada, Helen, > >On 5/25/16, 9:58 AM, "Ing-Wher (Helen) Chen" wrote: > >>Hi Lada, >> >>"metric" in this case is the operational state metric (or cost) of a >>route, and >>has identical definitions in in all three drafts (OSPF, ISIS, a

Re: [netmod] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

2016-05-25 Thread Kent Watsen
>> I think it would be better to use a more generic term for rpc + >> actions. Maybe operations: >> >>YANG is a data modeling language used to model configuration data, >>state data, operations, and notifications for network management >>protocols. > >I like 'operations' and the no

Re: [netmod] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

2016-05-25 Thread Dale R. Worley
Martin Bjorklund wrote on Mon, 23 May 2016 15:43:09 +0200 (CEST): > wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: Almost all of these points I'm happy with the authors fixing in the manner they suggest. The points where I have further comment are: > > The incompatibilities should be marked whethe