Re: [netmod] RFC 7950 on The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language

2016-09-01 Thread Per Hedeland
On 2016-09-02 00:14, Phil Shafer wrote: > Martin Bjorklund writes: >> See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020) > > I may be missing something but it says: > > o Allow "choice" as a shorthand "case" statement (see > Section 7.9.2). > > which is definitely in 6020. No, it isn'

Re: [netmod] RFC 7950 on The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language

2016-09-01 Thread Phil Shafer
Martin Bjorklund writes: >See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020) I may be missing something but it says: o Allow "choice" as a shorthand "case" statement (see Section 7.9.2). which is definitely in 6020. Thanks, Phil ___ netmod

Re: [netmod] RFC 7950 on The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language

2016-09-01 Thread Phil Shafer
Martin Bjorklund writes: >See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020) Doh! I was looking in the appendices. Thanks! Thanks, Phil ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] RFC 7950 on The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language

2016-09-01 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Phil Shafer wrote: > rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org writes: > >A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > >RFC 7950 > >Title: The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > > I don't see a "changes since YANG-1.0" section. Is this information > recorded somewh

Re: [netmod] RFC 7950 on The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language

2016-09-01 Thread Phil Shafer
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org writes: >A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >RFC 7950 >Title: The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language I don't see a "changes since YANG-1.0" section. Is this information recorded somewhere? Thanks, Phil _

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-08.txt

2016-09-01 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of YANG Data Model Documents Author : Andy Bierman

Re: [netmod] How to constrain a leaf to a read-only list of supported values?

2016-09-01 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:41:04AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > We keep having discussions about YANG conformance related issues. > The only unit of conformance is the YANG module, so it is possible to > think the way to solve the conformance/discovery problem is to put every > definition

Re: [netmod] How to constrain a leaf to a read-only list of supported values?

2016-09-01 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, We keep having discussions about YANG conformance related issues. The only unit of conformance is the YANG module, so it is possible to think the way to solve the conformance/discovery problem is to put every definition in its own module. This is operationally absurd of course, so someday YANG

Re: [netmod] How to constrain a leaf to a read-only list of supported values?

2016-09-01 Thread Vladimir Vassilev
One alternative for getting rid of unsupported "identity"-s is to use "if-feature" as sub-statement which is now supported in YANG 1.1. This would be an elegant solution for the example with the 3 compression methods. However for standard models one will either have to live with the many irrele

Re: [netmod] 3 RFCs in 1 day!

2016-09-01 Thread Lou Berger
On September 1, 2016 2:16:22 AM Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 01 Sep 2016, at 04:57, Andy Bierman wrote: Hi, I get to be the first to thank Martin and Lada for all the work that went into these RFCs. YANG 1.1 is finally done! And big thanks to you and all others who contributed. Jürgen als

[netmod] Publication of BBF TR-355 "YANG Modules for FTTdp Management"

2016-09-01 Thread William Lupton
All, The Broadband Forum (BBF) would like to announce that TR-355 "YANG Modules for FTTdp Management" has been published. The document can be downloaded at the BBF Technical Reports page and the YANG modules are available at

Re: [netmod] 3 RFCs in 1 day!

2016-09-01 Thread Balazs Lengyel
Congratulations and RMBAA ! Balazs On 2016-09-01 11:53, Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich) wrote: +1 Mehmet  Sent from my Samsung Gal

Re: [netmod] 3 RFCs in 1 day!

2016-09-01 Thread Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)
+1 Mehmet Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Benoit Claise Datum: 01.09.16 09:37 (GMT+02:00) An: netmod@ietf.org Betreff: Re: [netmod] 3 RFCs in 1 day! Indeed, great achievement. Thanks to everybody involved. Regards, Benoit. > With the pub

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23 (until Sep 9, 2016)

2016-09-01 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Kent Watsen writes: > [as a contributor] > > My only comment on this draft is that I’d prefer it if the > “routing-state” tree were moved into another YANG module, so that it > could be more easily deprecated when the opstate solution comes. I > suggested this before, with regards to rfc6087bis

Re: [netmod] 3 RFCs in 1 day!

2016-09-01 Thread Bert Wijnen (IETF)
I say CHEERS or UBA to that Bert On 01/09/16 07:54, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: With the publication of these three RFCs a major milestone has been reached - a big thank you to Martin and Lada and everybody who contributed to the development of these specifications over the last two ye

Re: [netmod] How to constrain a leaf to a read-only list of supported values?

2016-09-01 Thread Balazs Lengyel
Hello, The proposed iana-entity.yang seems to take the same approach: one file defining 28 identities. And I share all your concerns about iana-if-type. Balazs On 2016-08-31 14:16, Vladimir Vassilev wrote: On 08/31/2016 12:38 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 31 Aug 2016, at 11:10, Vladimir Va