On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> My biggest problem with deviations is that a number of things can not be
> deviated:
>
>- description
>- reference
>
>
This does seem quite useful.
I wonder why it got left out.
The way deviations work is rather counter-intuitive
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Balazs Lengyel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Similarly to Andy's idea we are thinking about declaring data nodes
> static-data. This means that
>
>- they can not be changed via the management interface e.g.
>CLI/Netconf/Restconf
>- that they are changed very infr
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert
> Varga
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:55 PM
> To: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] Augment non-existing input?
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask about interoperability of RPC's input statemen
Hi Robert,
> On 04 Oct 2016, at 13:55, Robert Varga wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask about interoperability of RPC's input statement and
> augments. Given two modules:
>
> module foo {
>rpc foo {
>output {
>leaf foo { type string; }
>}
>}
> }
>
> m
Hello,
I would like to ask about interoperability of RPC's input statement and
augments. Given two modules:
module foo {
rpc foo {
output {
leaf foo { type string; }
}
}
}
module bar {
import foo { prefix foo; }
augment /foo:foo/input {
leaf b
