Re: [netmod] BBF Entity Augmentations

2016-10-24 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, "Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)" wrote: > Reposting to fix formatting errors in the original message - still > looking for comments. > > Hello, > > In using the Entity module within the BBF, we have made several > enhancements to the module that we would like the IETF to consider for > inclusi

Re: [netmod] review of draft-ietf-pim-yang-03.txt

2016-10-24 Thread Benoit Claise
Dean, Thanks. As this is part of the early YANG doctor process, let me copy the YANG doctors, WG chairs, and ADs (as described at https://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/yang-doctors.html) Regards, Benoit Authors, I don’t have deep knowledge of PIM, so if some protocol specifics haven’t bee

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

2016-10-24 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi Kent, "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Thanks, Rob On 22/10/2016 14:31, Kent Watsen wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, This IPR disclosure requests is being made as part of the preparation for WG adoption of this draft. Are you aware of any IPR that applies to d

Re: [netmod] Call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

2016-10-24 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 22 Oct 2016, at 15:26, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > Dear working group, > > Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item > and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please > comment by Friday, November 4, 2016 so that the WG Chairs can gauge >