Re: [netmod] proposal to add 2 new guidelines in 6087bis

Hi, I think these guidelines should apply to other modules but using --ietf with pyang is up to the SDOs to decide. Andy On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani < mjethanand...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [netmod] proposal to add 2 new guidelines in 6087bis

> On Jan 27, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > The "pyang --ietf" validator checks the statement order used in > data-def-stmts. > There is no guideline that says this is required. > RFC 7950 says canonical order is RECOMMENDED. > > 1) data-def

[netmod] proposal to add 2 new guidelines in 6087bis

Hi, The "pyang --ietf" validator checks the statement order used in data-def-stmts. There is no guideline that says this is required. RFC 7950 says canonical order is RECOMMENDED. 1) data-def sub-statement order Proposal: add new last sentence to sec. 4.6, para 3: YANG data definition