Re: [netmod] Augmenting an unimplemented module

2017-02-09 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Christian Hopps writes: > Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 08:40:06AM -0500, Christian Hopps wrote: >>> >>> Is it allowed for a server to implement a module that augments another >>> module that it does not implement? My thinking was that the augment >>> would simply no

Re: [netmod] Module tags

2017-02-09 Thread Lou Berger
On February 9, 2017 7:20:22 AM Christian Hopps wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: Christian Hopps wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: > Christian Hopps wrote: >> The reason I went with the grouping and in-module list was that I >> thought one could then create selecting xpath expressions, e

Re: [netmod] Module tags

2017-02-09 Thread Christian Hopps
Martin Bjorklund writes: > Christian Hopps wrote: >> >> Martin Bjorklund writes: >> > Christian Hopps wrote: >> >> The reason I went with the grouping and in-module list was that I >> >> thought one could then create selecting xpath expressions, e.g., >> >> >> >>get foobar-value[../tags="

Re: [netmod] Module tags

2017-02-09 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Christian Hopps wrote: > > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > Christian Hopps wrote: > >> The reason I went with the grouping and in-module list was that I > >> thought one could then create selecting xpath expressions, e.g., > >> > >>get foobar-value[../tags="ietf:implements:foobar"] > > > > I'm

Re: [netmod] Module tags

2017-02-09 Thread Christian Hopps
Martin Bjorklund writes: > Christian Hopps wrote: >> The reason I went with the grouping and in-module list was that I >> thought one could then create selecting xpath expressions, e.g., >> >>get foobar-value[../tags="ietf:implements:foobar"] > > I'm not sure I understand what you're after,