Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

2017-04-07 Thread Alexander Clemm
I do have a question re: the rationale that is given in the document: " Today's Common practice is include the definition of the syntax used to represent a YANG module in every document that provides a tree diagram. This practice has several disadvantages and the purpose of the document is

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

2017-04-07 Thread Jeff Tantsura
yes/support (TM for Acee() Cheers, Jeff On 4/7/17, 7:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a >NETMOD working group document: > > draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Re: [netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-10.txt

2017-04-07 Thread Kent Watsen
I received some additional off-list comments regarding the concerns David raised below. There is a small group of folks that are formulating a response. I was hoping to send the response itself to the list by now, but it's not ready yet. So, instead, I'm just sending this message to let you know

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

2017-04-07 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Yes/Support Thanks, Acee P.S. Jeff Tantsura should have trademarked the ³Yes/Support² replyŠ On 4/7/17, 7:22 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: >All, > >This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a >NETMOD working group document: > > draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tr

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00

2017-04-07 Thread Kent Watsen
All, This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a NETMOD working group document: draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00 Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes,

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

2017-04-07 Thread Kent Watsen
All, This is start of a two-week poll on making the following draft a NETMOD working group document: draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. I

[netmod] choice statements and trim vs explicit default handling

2017-04-07 Thread Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi all, When a server operates in 'trim' mode (rfc6243), setting a leaf to its default value removes it from the config (i.e. it is indistinguishable from the case where that leaf was never configured or the case where that leaf was deleted/removed). (A) Does setting a leaf in one case of a ch

[netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on charter-ietf-netmod-08-02

2017-04-07 Thread Eric Rescorla
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-netmod-08-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along