Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model

Presumably a device is free to not implement an optional config=false node if that node would never be returned in a response anyway - as this will make no externally visible difference. However, if the model states or implies that the node is present under certain conditions (for example, the

[netmod] Schema-mount question: Augmentation to the Mounted Module

Hi Lada, We have got two questions on how to specify the module entries in a schema: 1. Are augmentations of parent modules inherited when augmented module is listed in schema-mounts schema? For example, ietf-ospf module augments ietf-routing. When we include ietf-routing to the schem

Re: [netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01

Hi, the typical -state tree consists of config false nodes and hence it represents operational state. This is not a transitioning period question, this is how -state trees were designed. Note also that the applied configuration is part of the operational state in NMDA - for config true objects, th

[netmod] Clarification Question on draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01

During discussing the adoption of this guidelines, a question came up w.r.t. the semantics of the non-NMDA "-state" module during the transitioning period: What kind of state do the leaves in the "-state" module represent? The applied configuration or the actually used operational data? Since on

Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Andy Bierman writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - > >> BE/Antwerp) wrote: > >>

Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model

Andy Bierman writes: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - >> BE/Antwerp) wrote: >> > >> > We have a question regarding the statistics container as defined in

[netmod] Document Action: 'YANG Module Classification' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'YANG Module Classification' (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Benoit Claise.

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : YANG Module Classification Authors : Dean Bogdanovic Benoit Claise

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : YANG Tree Diagrams Authors : Martin Bjorklund Lou Berger Filenam

Re: [netmod] Question on intefaces-state model

On 06/12/2017 08:31 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: > > We have a question regarding the