[netmod] upcoming adoptions

2017-08-29 Thread Kent Watsen
Hey folks, As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing RFCs to align them with NMDA. The first batch have been published as individual drafts: 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc

Re: [netmod] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04

2017-08-29 Thread Phil Shafer
Kent Watsen writes: >The NETMOD chairs need your on-list response to this email. >- all the other authors have already replied... I know of no IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Phil ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman

[netmod] netmod - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 100

2017-08-29 Thread IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Lou Berger, a Chair of the netmod working group. - Working Group Name: Network Modeling Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Lou Berger Number of Sessions:

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

2017-08-29 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, I agree with Juergen that these proposed guidelines are not a good idea. The priority order for YANG is (1) readers (2) writers and (3) toolmakers. It seems trivial for group (3) to convert the XSD pattern to some other format. It seems difficult to train all the people in groups (1) and (2) t

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

2017-08-29 Thread Robert Wilton
On 28/08/2017 16:46, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +, Xufeng Liu wrote: [Xufeng] [0..9] is still compliant with the XSD pattern specified by YANG 1.0 and 1.1. Using [0..9] instead of [\d] will make the implementations with native POSIX RegEx easier without

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Per Hedeland
On 2017-08-29 15:40, Lou Berger wrote: > > > On August 29, 2017 9:03:22 AM Per Hedeland wrote: > >> On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote: >>> On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Lou Berger wrote: > Lada, > > > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Lou Berger writes: > Lada, > > > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: >>> Lada, >>> >>> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other disconnects? This is really sc

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Lou Berger
On August 29, 2017 9:03:22 AM Per Hedeland wrote: On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote: On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Lou Berger wrote: Lada, On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Lou Berger píae v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: Lada, On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM,

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Per Hedeland
On 2017-08-29 14:34, Lou Berger wrote: > On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> Lou Berger wrote: >>> Lada, >>> >>> >>> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Lou Berger píae v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: > Lada, > > On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrot

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Lou Berger
For me usage standpoint it really would be much simpler in the model definition and use for the mount point to behave like a container. What are your technical objections to this change? Note that the encoding from a protocol standpoint would be the same as a container. Thanks Lou On August

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Lou Berger wrote: > On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Lou Berger wrote: > >> Lada, > >> > >> > >> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: > Lada, > > On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >>

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Lou Berger
On 08/29/2017 03:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> Lada, >> >> >> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: Lada, On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Can you please take a look at it and see

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04

2017-08-29 Thread Robert Wilton
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Rob On 25/08/2017 21:20, Lou Berger wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR t

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

2017-08-29 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote: > In this discussion, let's keep in mind that the openconfig modules use the > POSIX regex while the IETF uses the W3C regex. > So for operators that have to deal with a mix of openconfig and IETF > modules, this type of advice could be

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

2017-08-29 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Lou Berger wrote: > Lada, > > > On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400: > >> Lada, > >> > >> On 8/28/2017 9:30 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Can you please take a look at it and see if we have any other > disconnects? > >>> Thi

Re: [netmod] Potential additions to rfc6087bis: RegEx guidelines

2017-08-29 Thread Benoit Claise
In this discussion, let's keep in mind that the openconfig modules use the POSIX regex while the IETF uses the W3C regex. So for operators that have to deal with a mix of openconfig and IETF modules, this type of advice could be handy from a tooling point of view. Such advice, if not in RFC6087b