Hi Rob,
Thanks for the proposal. I think that the subtree does help, to a certain
extend. The approach is worth mentioning to the implementers, though the
remaining XPath is still complicated and could be worse for a more complex
model. The good thing about the approach is that this is what
I agree - let's keep the module name and mark the nodes obsolete.
Kent // any hat
Robert Wilton wrote:
>
>
> On 09/10/2017 22:06, Benoit Claise wrote:
> > On 10/6/2017 6:01 PM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/10/2017 16:32, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>> Benoit Claise wrote:
>
I've also been thinking about this problem a bit more :-)
The XPath solution works, but the expression isn't particularly nice to
write, and I suspect that implementations may struggle to implement it
efficiently (if they support XPath filtering at all).
A nicer solution here might be to allo
Igor
Thinking laterally, this is a problem that DNS encountered a few decades
ago and solved, by allowing the server to include additional information
not specifically requested that the server can see is going to be needed
for the next step, so if the client asks only about a CNAME, then the
serv
Hi,
FYI - we have moved the individual draft
draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module to CCAMP. It is now called
draft-vallin-ccamp-alarm-module-00 (same technical content as
before).
So, please move the discussion about this draft to CCAMP. It might be
a good idea to indicate your support (or objectio
