Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Support. > On Jan 25, 2018, at 5:26 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > Hi, > > This is the start of a *two* week poll on making > draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please send > email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If > indicating no, please st

[netmod] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05

Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker Review result: Has Nits I have reviewed the document and it is generally free of security considerations as claimed. There are some areas of concern however, the significance of which may become more apparent as such tools find future use. As described in the docume

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10.txt

This version addresses Ben Campbell's and Suresh Krishnan's IESG Telechat comments. Thanks, Acee On 1/25/18, 12:07 PM, "netmod on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work ite

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NMDA Version) Authors : Ladislav Lhotka

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Suresh, Thanks for the review - see inline. On 1/24/18, 10:43 AM, "Suresh Krishnan" wrote: Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

Kent, I see a lot of suggestions to reference other drafts as examples.  I would discourage doing that.  I recommend this draft clearly stating the desire, including its own examples if needed. I recall a remark by Rajiv (in cc) during a NETMOD meeting, along the lines of: I want to create

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

support, as a contributor this draft is needed to resolve a zerotouch last call issue K. On 25/01/2018 13:26, Lou Berger wrote: > Hi, > > This is the start of a *two* week poll on making > draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please > send email to the list indicating

Re: [netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Support. Thanks, Rob On 25/01/2018 13:26, Lou Berger wrote: Hi, This is the start of a *two* week poll on making draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your r

[netmod] WG: Adoption Poll: draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext-01

Hi, This is the start of a *two* week poll on making draft-bierman-netmod-yang-data-ext a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free t

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

I see a lot of suggestions to reference other drafts as examples. I would discourage doing that. I recommend this draft clearly stating the desire, including its own examples if needed. Regarding referencing the tree-diagrams draft, I don't agree that having a "Tree Diagrams" section in the I

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

On 1/25/2018 12:59 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:20:11PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: PROPOSAL (replacing the previous paragraph) If YANG tree diagrams are used, then a normative reference to the YANG tree diagrams specification MUST be provided.

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:20:11PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: > PROPOSAL (replacing the previous paragraph) > >If YANG tree diagrams are used, then a normative reference to the >YANG tree diagrams specification MUST be provided. As an example > guideline >(from > https

[netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-16 Part 1

Dear all, Thank you for this important document. I've been spending quite some time trying to relay feedback seen on multiple fronts. This is part 1 of the review, till section 4.21 - This document defines a set of usage guidelines for Standards Track documents containing [RFC7950

[netmod] Validators updated in the toolchain

Dear all, yanglint upgraded to 0.14.65 from 0.13.79 yangdump-pro upgraded to 17.10-4 from 17.10-3 pyang upgraded to the latest github version (still version 1.7.3), but compliant to draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-05