On 17/04/18 07:35, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a slippery slope. If we want to turn YANG into a general-purpose
> schema language, it should IMO be done the other way around: design a
> general-purpose schema language with a sound architecture, and then use
> it for defining schemas o
Hi,
As discussed at the NETMOD WG session in IETF 101, London, we would like
to set up a design team for YANG versioning.
The proposed charter for the design team is as follows:
The YANG Model Versioning Design Team is chartered to propose a revised
approach to supporting YANG module updates. T
