On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 05:25:32PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
>
> One alternative way to build a robust client would be to have an internally
> defined schema by the client (perhaps based on open models, or perhaps a
> particular version of vendor models, possibly with some deviations, or
On 25/07/2018 12:03, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
But if fixing a definition requires a whole new module name then I think
that causes lots of problems (e.g. consider needing to change ief-interfaces
to ietf-interfaces-v2 because
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> But if fixing a definition requires a whole new module name then I think
> that causes lots of problems (e.g. consider needing to change ief-interfaces
> to ietf-interfaces-v2 because of changing one random leaf).
I assume this