On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> > > > draft-
On 15/10/2018 21:49, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Picking up on your YANG 1.2 comment. Please add a YANG-next issue, if this
> is not being tracked already. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues.
https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/53
I think I captured the gist of the
On 06/03/2018 00:56, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : YANG Data Extensions
> Authors : Andy Bierman
On 10/15/18 4:25 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Martin Bjorklund writes:
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 19:23 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
wrote:
On 2018-10-10, 9:59 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" <
netmod-boun
Hi Robert,
Picking up on your YANG 1.2 comment. Please add a YANG-next issue, if this
is not being tracked already. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues.
Thanks,
Kent
-Original Message-
From: netmod on behalf of Robert Varga
Date: Monday, October 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM
To: Ma
On 15/10/2018 21:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Varga wrote:
>> It is wide-spread practice to use tailf:action and target statements
>> within it with augment/deviate statements -- which I think is a failure
>> to follow RFC7950 section 6.3.1:
>>
>>Care must be taken when defini
Hi,
Robert Varga wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have recently been reminded that there is a potential interoperability
> issue between RFC6020/RFC7950 and extension statements. So far the only
> case where this has manifested is tailf:action, but there may be others
> lurking in the future.
>
> The issu
Hello,
I have recently been reminded that there is a potential interoperability
issue between RFC6020/RFC7950 and extension statements. So far the only
case where this has manifested is tailf:action, but there may be others
lurking in the future.
The issue is that a YANG extension has no standard
Hi Andy,
Please find our comment in line below
Thanks,
Ankit
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 06:15, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Reviewer: Andy Bierman
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
>
>
>
> Overall:
>- no compiler warnings; passes --ietf check as well
>
> Normative Sections:
>
> sec 1:
>- YANG versio
Martin Bjorklund writes:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 19:23 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 2018-10-10, 9:59 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" <
>> > > netmod-boun...@i
Hi,
Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: No Objection
> > >
> > > When responding, please keep
11 matches
Mail list logo