[netmod] Today’s YANG-Next Discussion

Reminder: today there is a 2-hour deep-dive meeting on YANG Next in Karlin 3 from 15:00-17:00. Kent ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On 3/26/19 17:04, Alex Campbell wrote: > As I understand it,the only purpose for the candidate and startup datastores > is to indirectly set the contents of the running datastore. > > Therefore it wouldn't make sense to have different factory defaults for the > running, startup and candidate dat

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

As I understand it,the only purpose for the candidate and startup datastores is to indirectly set the contents of the running datastore. Therefore it wouldn't make sense to have different factory defaults for the running, startup and candidate datastores. And those are the only writable ones. J

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00

Support. > On Mar 25, 2019, at 9:30 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00 > > > Please voice your support or objections

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:51 PM Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > Qin, > > the idea should be to make things simpler, not more complex. Perhaps > it is not necessary to expose N options to reset a device. Perhaps a > simple "factory-reset" RPC which resets all

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-versioning-reqs-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Module Versioning Requirements Author : Joe Clarke Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-ve

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

No, I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Balazs On 2019. 03. 25. 21:17, Kent Watsen wrote: To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line. In order to complete the Adoption poll, are y

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Yingzhen From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 1:32 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

Kent: This is a useful feature. The draft is a good place to start the work, but there are issues that need to be agreed upon. Sue On Monday 25/03/2019 at 4:35 pm, Kent Watsen wrote: This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factor

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

发件人: Kent Watsen [mailto:k...@watsen.net] 发送时间: 2019年3月26日 15:37 收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) 抄送: Kent Watsen ; netmod@ietf.org; Balázs Lengyel ; Qin Wu 主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02 I would rather see fixed more generically to allow copying between two c

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00

I support WG adoption. Acee From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 4:31 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 4:33 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft

Re: [netmod] WebEx for today's YANG versioning design team working session

Having taken a quick look in the room then it looks like we should be able to project and also hopefully connect to teleconferencing. Thanks, Rob > -Original Message- > From: netmod On Behalf Of Joe Clarke > Sent: 26 March 2019 12:20 > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] WebEx for t

[netmod] WebEx for today's YANG versioning design team working session

We have created a WebEx (see below) for today's working session meeting for those that may want to join from remote. We will all be able to see the shared content that comes from our discussion. However, the audio may not be very strong. The meeting is at 16:00 UTC+1 until 18:30 UTC+1 today, Mar

Re: [netmod] instance data new backward compatibility text

Hi I agree with Juergen. I think section 6 should be removed. This document should specify the document format (which it does), but it shouldn't specify specific rules for the different use cases. /martin Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Your rules are use case specific and I am not convinced

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Mar 26, 2019, 7:41 AM +0100, Rob Wilton (rwilton) , wrote: > Support. > > From: netmod On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: 25 March 2019 21:32 > To: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 > > This email begins a 2-week ad

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00

Kent Watsen píše v Po 25. 03. 2019 v 20:30 +: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. > > Kent (and Lou and Joel) I support the adoption. Lada > > _

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

Kent Watsen píše v Po 25. 03. 2019 v 20:32 +: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. > > Kent // as co-chair I support the adoption. Lada > > > __

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

+1 to Juergen's comments and diagram. Thanks, Rob > -Original Message- > From: netmod On Behalf Of Juergen > Schoenwaelder > Sent: 26 March 2019 08:23 > To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default > > On Tue, Mar 2

[netmod] draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang

Hi, Took a look at the draft, some comments/questions: 1. Use of instance-identifier, so we need to list all instances individually? 2. Is the only possible action a set operation? In some cases an action such as reset would be desirable, have you considered RPC? 3. There are errors in

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

I support adoption of this draft as a WG document. From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 9:33 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

I support adoption of this draft as a WG document. +1 to what various people said with regards to simplifications needed in the document. From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 9:35 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-fa

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00

I support adoption of this draft as a WG document. From: netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen Date: Monday, March 25, 2019 at 9:31 PM To: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-schoenw-netmod-rfc6991-bis-00 This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Joe Clarke wrote: > >> On 3/26/19 03:22, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:26AM -0400, Joe Clarke wrote: On 3/26/19 01:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: Qin, the idea should be to make things si

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On 3/26/19 03:22, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:26AM -0400, Joe Clarke wrote: >> On 3/26/19 01:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>> Qin, >>> >>> the idea should be to make things simpler, not more complex. Perhaps >>> it is not necessary to expose N options to reset a

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

> I would rather see fixed more generically to allow copying > between two configuration datastores than specifically augmenting > specifically for this datastore. Hence, I think that extending/replacing the > RPC could probably be deferred to a NETCONF-bis or > NETCONF-NMDA-bis document.

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:12:26AM -0400, Joe Clarke wrote: > On 3/26/19 01:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > Qin, > > > > the idea should be to make things simpler, not more complex. Perhaps > > it is not necessary to expose N options to reset a device. Perhaps a > > simple "factory-reset" RPC

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On 3/25/19 07:14, Joe Clarke wrote: > I support the need for being able to reset a DS to its factory default. > However, I have a question on the current design of the model and the > "factory-default" DS. > > It seems to me that this is a single DS that might have been intended to > reset running

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

On 3/25/19 16:34, Kent Watsen wrote: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. > I support, and I've already sent some comments. I think more work is needed

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01

On 3/25/19 16:32, Kent Watsen wrote: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chopps-netmod-geo-location-01 > > Please voice your support or objections before April 8. I support adoption. Joe ___ netmo

Re: [netmod] Question on draft-wu-netmod-factory-default

On 3/26/19 01:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Qin, > > the idea should be to make things simpler, not more complex. Perhaps > it is not necessary to expose N options to reset a device. Perhaps a > simple "factory-reset" RPC which resets all relevant datastores in an > implementation specific ma

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-02

I support this draft as a starting place for this work, but I would like to see some changes in the final solution: I think that having a datastore report the factory default configuration is good, and it is also right that this should be optional to implement, since some devices might not have