I support WG adoption.
I have read the draft and think it helps network auto-configuration and
interoperability.
Thanks,
Bo
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2019年5月9日 5:52
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
主题: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-03
This
This email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-netmod-factory-default-03
As we already have consensus from the previous poll to work on the problem,
this poll primarily seeks for objections for using -03 as a basis for WG
adoption (the document will be ad
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 01:53:27PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > If you look at the various RFC - YANG, Netconf, NMDA - they all define
> > the terms 'client' and 'server'; in the context, 'YANG server' seems
> > appropriate.
>
> I agree w/ Joe. I had the same comment when
tom petch wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)"
> Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 4:11 PM
> >
> > On May 6, 2019, at 08:06, Qin Wu
> mailto:bill...@huawei.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Chairs:
> > Sorry for late follow up, thanks Jurgen, Andy,Joe, Joel and all others
> for go
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)"
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2019 4:11 PM
>
> On May 6, 2019, at 08:06, Qin Wu
mailto:bill...@huawei.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, Chairs:
> Sorry for late follow up, thanks Jurgen, Andy,Joe, Joel and all others
for good comments, here is the update based
Thanks Randy for your comments and insights in the history of that management
technologies!
Helpful, appreciated!
Albrecht
-Original Message-
From: netmod On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
Sent: 07 May 2019 05:37
To: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Management Protocol Roles: Client/Serve
