Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-06.txt

Hi Lou (shepherd), The requested updates have been pushed to GitHub, as can be seen by the commit diff: https://github.com/netmod-wg/artwork-folding/commit/24a1b25abd4d33c2ac07f09b1daa8725b5061f4c .

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft From: Kent Watsen Date: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 3:07 PM To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" , David Ball , Tapraj Singh , Selvakumar Sivaraj Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05 To each author

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft From: Kent Watsen Date: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 3:07 PM To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" , David Ball , Tapraj Singh , Selvakumar Sivaraj Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" Subject: IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07 To each

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. From: Kent Watsen Sent: 10 July 2019 15:08 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; David Ball (daviball) ; Tapraj Singh (tapsingh) ; Selvakumar Sivaraj Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07 To eac

Re: [netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. From: Kent Watsen Sent: 10 July 2019 15:07 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; David Ball (daviball) ; Tapraj Singh (tapsingh) ; Selvakumar Sivaraj Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05 To each autho

[netmod] IPR poll on WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07

To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line. In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies to WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07? Please Reply-All to *this* email and state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

[netmod] IPR poll on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

To each author and contributor listed on the "To" line. In order to complete the Adoption poll, are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05? Please Reply-All to *this* email and state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" o "Yes,

[netmod] draft netconf 105 agenda posted.

The draft NETMOD 105 agenda has been posted and reproduced below. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-105-netmod/ Any corrections or updates needed? Presenters: 1) Please let the chairs know ASAP if needing to present remotely. 2) Please send your slides to the chairs by Friday,

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-06.txt

Hi Kent, Authors, Sorry for the delay in processing this.  WRT your comments, see below: On 6/27/2019 5:35 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: This update primarily regards the non-normative script:     - renamed to "rfcfold"     - now only uses sed one-liners     - auto-detects if platforms `[g]sed` and

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

Yes/support Cheers, Jeff > On Jul 9, 2019, at 17:15, Kent Watsen wrote: > > All, > > This starts a twelve-day working group last call for > draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05. > > The working group last call ends on July 21 (the day before the NETMOD 105 > sessions). Please send you

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

I've reviewed this document and support publication. I don’t have comments on the module per se. However, the IETF tools need to include the IEEE YANG model needed for successful validation. Thanks, Acee On 7/9/19, 8:15 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: All, This star

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-07

I have reviewed the subject document and support publication. I have the following comment: Perhaps ietf-interface-ethernet-like module ethlike:ethernet-like/ethlike:statistics could include a subset of the counters from RFC 3635. I say a subset since some of these counters are a bit archaic