Thanks Rob for good review and proposed text, I will incorporate them in v-13,
the only comment I am not sure is comment 3, I have nothing to add for
instruction for RFC editor besides
RFC Editor note in the YANG data model code to remind the RFC Editor to replace
RFC xxx and related date to act
Agree that ideally we avoid (a) in running. Unfortunately I think we used (a)
in ietf-interfaces though:
leaf type {
type identityref {
base interface-type;
}
mandatory true;
description
"The type of the interface.
Agree with Dan. The use case is valid, though the errors in the data model
can be fixed.
Support.
Thanks,
- Xufeng
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:44 AM King, Daniel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Expressing, and delegating base imperative policy to network nodes
> (regardless if it’s a switch, router, netw
Hi,
Thanks for writing this document. I found this document to be well written,
clear and understandable. However, there are a few issues which I think could
be addressed before kicking off IETF LC.
I have the following comments:
1. Title: The title of the document may be clearer as: "A
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
- Xufeng
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:45 AM Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
-邮件原件-
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Sch?nw?lder, Jürgen
发送时间: 2020年2月19日 20:18
收件人: Benoit Claise
抄送: netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang
Benoit,
thanks for the clarification.
I still believe that the approach taken is wrong.
