Joel,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:44, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Hi Martin,
thank you for your comments! Please see replies inline,
--- Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 8:59 AM
> To: joe...@bogus.com
> Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] WGLC
In my view, an ECA model allows to define rules for events – conditions –
actions, i.e. what actions to perform when an event occurs and a condition met.
A smart filter filters an input stream, letting some objects pass but not
others. They are not the same.
There is a connection in that you
Hi Juergen,
thank you for your comments! Please find replies inline,
--- Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Schönwälder, Jürgen
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:57 AM
> To: Joel Jaeggli
> Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod]
Hi, Rob:
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年2月26日 2:02
收件人: Qin Wu ; netmod@ietf.org
主题: RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-13.txt
Hi Qin,
I think that you may have accidentally removed the RFC editor instructions in
the YANG module
Hi the authors,
>“Another one to allow the definition of custom events/notifications, or smart
>filters for push updates. (We should bring back the earlier draft.)”
As we worked on the smart filter before. We want to use the ECA model.
It seems this model enabled the generic programmability.
Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
(Back in 2017; see datatracker)
--- Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 11:45 AM
> To: draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-d...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject:
Hi,
I support this draft and would like to see netmod work on this, but I do think
some aspects need more maturing and parts of this probably should be rescoped.
Should the draft be adopted now, or should it be improved first and adopted
later? Not sure. I would like to see the work
Hi Qin,
I think that you may have accidentally removed the RFC editor instructions in
the YANG module that presumably we want to still keep?
// RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC
publication
// and remove this note.
// RFC
v-13 is posted, the diff is:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-13
Thanks Rob for valuable review.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表
internet-dra...@ietf.org
发送时间: 2020年2月25日 20:36
收件人: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
抄送:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Factory Default Settings
Authors : Qin Wu
Balazs Lengyel
Thanks Rob for clarification. I will post the new version based on your review
suggestions soon.
-Qin
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年2月25日 20:10
收件人: Qin Wu ; draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org;
netmod@ietf.org
抄送: Warren Kumari
主题: RE: [Incoming] AD
Hi Qin,
From: Qin Wu
Sent: 25 February 2020 10:44
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Cc: Warren Kumari
Subject: RE: [Incoming] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-12
HI, Rob:
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
HI, Rob:
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年2月25日 18:23
收件人: Qin Wu ; draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org;
netmod@ietf.org
抄送: Warren Kumari
主题: RE: [Incoming] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-12
Hi Qin,
Thanks for getting back to be me
Hi Qin,
Thanks for getting back to be me quickly. Please see [RW] inline …
From: Qin Wu
Sent: 25 February 2020 02:22
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Cc: Warren Kumari
Subject: RE: [Incoming] AD review of
Hi ALL,
I have read this draft and if my understanding is correct, I believe the main
idea of this draft is to preconfigure the device with some policy rule, which
allows the device have the capability of self control on the management
behavior within the system and have a prompt rapid
16 matches
Mail list logo