Thanks Roman.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: Roman Danyliw [mailto:r...@cert.org]
发送时间: 2020年5月9日 4:16
收件人: Qin Wu ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; Kent Watsen ;
draft-ietf-netmod-factory-defa...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; The IESG
主题: RE: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on
Hi,
On 2020-05-08, 5:12 PM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
Hi,
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This came up during this week's meeting. We briefly discussed whether
> there's a need to version sub-modules or can we restrict versioning to
> modules only.
Hi,
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This came up during this week's meeting. We briefly discussed whether
> there's a need to version sub-modules or can we restrict versioning to
> modules only. We would like to hear from the WG on this, especially
> those with experience managing
Hi Qin!
Top posting to say thanks for the updated texted that was added to -15. It
addresses my DISCUSS points.
Regards,
Roman
> -Original Message-
> From: Qin Wu
> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2020 11:00 PM
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Roman Danyliw
> Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; Kent
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:48:06AM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote:
> Does yang consider that there is a difference between a bit being
> present and zero and a bit being absent?
In YANG every bit in the bit set is either 0 or 1. The xml / json
encodings send the position of the 1 bits (actually the
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:48 AM Jim Schaad wrote:
> Does yang consider that there is a difference between a bit being present
> and zero and a bit being absent?
>
>
>
leaf bits-leaf {
type bits {
bit zero { position 0; }
bit one { position 1; }
bit two {
Does yang consider that there is a difference between a bit being present and
zero and a bit being absent?
From: core On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 8:58 AM
To: Carsten Bormann
Cc: c...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] [netmod] CBOR YANG encoding of union &
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:51 AM Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:22 PM Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
>> On 2020-05-08, at 05:27, Andy Bierman wrote:
>> >
>> > Why is the bit position allowed to be a uint32 in YANG? Who knows, but
>> it has to be supported.
>>
>> If we think that
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 11:22 PM Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-05-08, at 05:27, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > Why is the bit position allowed to be a uint32 in YANG? Who knows, but
> it has to be supported.
>
> If we think that is the way to go, I like Kio’s proposal over in the CBOR
> list:
>
Seems that I better address this subject to ietf-netmode.
Sorry for the trouble.
Regards, Bart
From: netconf On Behalf Of Bogaert, Bart (Nokia -
BE/Antwerp)
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 4:55 PM
To: netc...@ietf.org
Subject: [netconf] Question related to ietf-netconf-with-defaults
Hi,
I have a
Hi,
We discussed using something along the lines of
module-or-submodule-name['@'date]['#'revision-label].yang. Questions to the WG:
1) Is there a need for both date and revision-label or is one of them enough?
2) If we have both, what's the impact of having "#revision-label" on
implementations
Hi,
This came up during this week's meeting. We briefly discussed whether there's a
need to version sub-modules or can we restrict versioning to modules only. We
would like to hear from the WG on this, especially those with experience
managing sub-modules.
For completeness, below is an update
On 2020-05-08, at 05:27, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> Why is the bit position allowed to be a uint32 in YANG? Who knows, but it has
> to be supported.
If we think that is the way to go, I like Kio’s proposal over in the CBOR list:
13 matches
Mail list logo
