On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 07:22:27PM +, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>
> As an AD:
> Whether this can be done as a verified errata isn't so clear, but would
> obviously depend on the proposed text.
>
I have proposed text that tries to fix the unfortunate use of
'syntax'. Does the AD see an issu
> -Original Message-
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Sent: 25 February 2021 18:01
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] type equivalence
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> >
> > Since the YANG module versionin
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:00 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> >
> > Since the YANG module versioning draft clarifies the BC/NBC rules,
> perhaps we could add text to clarify this in th
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 05:10:21PM +, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>
> Since the YANG module versioning draft clarifies the BC/NBC rules, perhaps we
> could add text to clarify this in that draft?
>
> I.e., perhaps something for section 3.1.3 of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Björklund
> Sent: 22 February 2021 10:14
> To: j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] type equivalence
>
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > Thanks Martin,
> >
> > so you are saying that
