> From: Michael Richardson
> Sent: Montag, 5. Juli 2021 00:17
> Fries, Steffen wrote:
> >> I thought I wrote a really nice ASCII art version of what documents
> inherit
> from
> >> RFC8366. I can't find it in my outbox... I wonder if I nuked the
> draft by
> mistake.
> >>
> >>
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your detailed review.
A new draft version has been posted.
URL:https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities-17.txt
Status:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-notification-capabilities/
Htmlized:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ht
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for accommodating my suggestions. All resolutions look good to me.
I have a preference to hold shipping this document to IETF LC until the
instance-data doc is also ready. I think that it will help the IESG review if
they have both documents available to review at the same t
From: netmod on behalf of Michael Richardson
Sent: 05 July 2021 00:21
Michael Richardson wrote:
> I propose that the WG adopt this as the -00, and then we change the
document
> to change this into an RFC7224-style IANA-maintained YANG module.
> (In DHC WG, when we did RFC3315bis t
Hello Rob,
Thanks for the review. Here are my answers below. I will also upload the
new version asap.
Regards Balazs
---
Hi,
Here is my AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-13.
Thanks for this document, I think that it r
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Instance Data File Format
Authors : Balazs Lengyel
Benoit Claise
File
tp> Likewise involving IANA. They maintain registries which anyone can
tp> access. They perform updates, on request, according to the policy of
tp> the registry, which is set when the registry is set up and can range
tp> from requiring a Standards Track RFC to First Come First Se
From: Michael Richardson
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2021 16:17
tp> Likewise involving IANA. They maintain registries which anyone can
tp> access. They perform updates, on request, according to the policy of
tp> the registry, which is set when the registry is set up and can range
Tom writes:
> If by 'value' that means the value substatement of the 'enum' YANG
> statement, then that may not give you what you expect. What goes on
> the wire is the text name string. If a number is displayed to a user,
> then it is because the local software had deduced one,
Hi -
On 2021-07-05 9:13 AM, tom petch wrote:
...
Well my answer would be that confusion reigns. An IANA Registry is >
authoritative so the minute the RFC is published asking IANA to
maintain a module, then the module in RFC8366(-bis) is obsolete.
Trouble is, that the rest of the RFC - if any -
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> In ltru the I-Ds contained both material for publication
> in the RFC as well as a *massive* amount of material for
> population of the IANA language tag registry. We needed
> it in I-D form for review during development, but wanted to
> remove all temp
11 matches
Mail list logo
