[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-17.txt

2021-07-28 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Instance Data File Format Authors : Balazs Lengyel Benoit Claise File

Re: [netmod] yang-instance-file include-defaults leaf

2021-07-28 Thread Balázs Lengyel
Hello Rob, Removing the “default trim;” will address Andy’s comment. Your in-use-values is very specific to one of the use-cases: reading/documenting operational values. It is not useful for the other use-cases. I think the “documenting operational datastore” use-case could be handled by in

Re: [netmod] yang-instance-file include-defaults leaf

2021-07-28 Thread Balázs Lengyel
Hello Andy, I will remove the “default trim; “ Balazs From: Andy Bierman Sent: 2021. július 27., kedd 19:00 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Cc: Balázs Lengyel ; NetMod WG Subject: Re: [netmod] yang-instance-file include-defaults leaf Hi, None of this addresses my point that a default val

Re: [netmod] system configuration sync mechanism

2021-07-28 Thread Kent Watsen
WG, Regarding yesterday’s datastore presentation, there seemed to be support for "Option #2”, which is to have merge into . It was noted that this then would mean that client-validation of would necessitate understanding how the merge works, to expand templates, resolve leafrefs, etc. My t

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-28 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:12:09PM -0400, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > > On Jul 17, 2021, at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 07:17:09PM -0400, Christian Hopps wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Jul 17, 2021, at 6:14 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > >>> > >>> So, when we ref

[netmod] YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2021-07-27

2021-07-28 Thread Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2021-07-27 We reviewed and updated the IETF111 slides - moved discussion of the main open issue (YANG 1.1 vs 1.2 vs 2.0) to the end - added summary slides of 1st two drafts Reconfirmed reasons why we propose these drafts as part of YANG 1.1: - no real harm